4.0 Conclusions
4.1
As they plunge into a deepening crisis, the DPRK realises that it is at a
critical crossroads. It is our firm conclusion that they are seeking a way
forward. When they say that they
are seeking a peaceable outcome they should be taken at their word and the
sincerity of their claim tested through engagement.
4.2
The history of the DPRK suggests that mere threats will be counter-productive,
inducing paranoia, isolationism, and the destabilization of the region. Recent
US policy has convinced the regime that the status quo is not an option. The
DPRK now needs a face-saving exit strategy. Progress on these issues would
further enable progress on the human rights issues that motivated our visit. A
divided Korea is provoking regional instability. A united Korea could be a force
for stability in the region and be a strong counter weight to other regional
players.
4.3 In the short-term we are deeply
concerned about the plight of repatriated refugees and about the conditions in
the prisons. The international
community should not await the resolution of strategic issues before pursuing
these questions with the DPRK. But
we are convinced that engagement on all fronts represents the best way forward.
The delegation will form an All-Party Parliamentary British-North Korean group
to facilitate our own continued engagement and we hope that the Foreign Office
will provide resources to enable its work to prosper.
David
Alton Caroline Cox
September
25th, 2003.